> In Anglish, theology would be godlore. rhetoric is speechcraft. doctors would be healers, journalists newsmen, and status-signalling would be rankmarking. A rodent is a gnawdeer while a comedian is a laughtersmith.
Exquisite. What a loss that those aren't common now.
Modern English is just particularly goofy, young, and not conservative, especially in its American variant. We rankmark by accumulating more exotic words with more exotic vowels, until the vocabulary is absurdly large and redundant.
[1] https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~beatrice/110/docs/uncleftish-beh...
We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.
every word except "surrender" has an Anglo-Saxon root.
A miracle of deliverance, achieved by valor, by perseverance, by perfect discipline, by faultless service, by resource, by skill, by unconquerable fidelity, is manifest to us all.
https://winstonchurchill.org/resources/speeches/1940-the-fin...
(That form of repetition seems to be called anaphora, I just learned.)
It’s interesting that people often comment on the Anglo-Saxon/Germanic roots of that famous phrase – but nobody finds it weird to use Germanic words in a (defensive) war against Germany and eschewing French words in support of France in this war. The explanation seems to be the specific English context: there the connotation of Anglo-Saxon as the language of the people seems to override any germanic associations.
> Wants pawn term, dare worsted ladle gull hoe lift wetter murder inner ladle cordage, honor itch offer lodge dock florist...
And who will find new appreciation from this article for what Tolkien was about and why it's said he created his stories to accommodate his exploration of these root languages!
Maura Labingi Frodo Baggins
Banazîr "Ban" Galpsi Samwise "Sam" Gamgee
But online, the Anglish community appears to me to have been overtaken by an, at minimum, unpleasant "anglo-saxon nationalism" (as if such a thing even makes sense). At worst, it is downright scary.
Exploring the counterfactual history of English without French is fascinating.
Pushing one version of such an exploration as what Anglo-Saxons (read: the English) ought to do, implicitly or explicitly denying that the identity of the English (and other inhabitants of the British Isles) after 1000+ years is inextricably tied up with other languages, is deranged.
(unlabeled) = Topics Wey Dem Resemble
Related = Another thing we de for inside dis tori
More = Di one wey oda users dey read well well
eg https://www.bbc.com/pidgin/articles/cly6g3e46y3o