L
Story
Lily Programming Language
What I really want to see from a "*-programming-language" post on HN is _why_. Why Lily?
I am curious as well. some past readme has Why sections and I am not sure why they are removed/changed

this have "Why" section https://gitlab.com/FascinatedBox/lily/-/blob/d3ace2907747106...

this have "How Lily stands out from other languages:" section https://gitlab.com/FascinatedBox/lily/-/blob/785a88534cced53...

The README on gitlab at least has a sentence or two on that: https://gitlab.com/FascinatedBox/lily

> An interpreted language with a focus on expressiveness and type safety

Personally I think typed scripting languages could be the future. They should support AOT compilation where necessary.

  • keyle
  • ·
  • 3 hours ago
  • ·
  • [ - ]
Why do you think that's the future?

Isn't a waste to essentially reinterpret an entire program that may be run 5000 times a day?

AOT compilation, how is that different than make && run?

At some point, you have a compiled language, if it's quick to compile, you're doing the AOT yourself, the scripting is an illusion. Pun intended.

Isn't it a waste to run a test suite for a program that would run 1M times a day in production?

The key adjective here is successfully run. You want to detect any errors as early as possible. Ideally even at the early stages of writing the script, when a typechecker is already able to point at certain errors, and thus help avoid missteps in further design.

a statically typed aot compiled scripting language is... not
I script with Rust via cargo-script, it works great. Scripting is a task for when you want to achieve something in one file instead of a full blown application. It is not about the language, you can script in C or assembly if you so chose.
"Scripting" is a role: an embedded, human-friendly, compact language, also suitable for interactive work / REPL.

(Laugh all you want, but Haskell has a rather nice REPL, and can work as a scripting language.)

Luau gets pretty close to statically typed and AOT compiled now. It's still a scripting language.

Even C or Rust can be a scripting language. You just integrate the toolchain to your app, same as every other scripting language.

From the link:

> Key features of Lily:

> Built-in template mode

> Embed/extend in C

> Single-inheritance classes

> Exceptions

> Generics

> Algebraic data types (with Option and Result predefined).

That’s what. Not why.
The why: because Lua, Python, JavaScript, Janet, etc lack many or all these features. And each of these features is known to make life easier for a human programmer.
Looking through that list of features, Ruby (the dynamic language I know best) has all but 1 built-in (and the other can be added with Gems). I'm guessing Python probably has them all too (but I don't know Python that well). They're pretty common. So the why still isn't clear.
  • nine_k
  • ·
  • 58 minutes ago
  • ·
  • [ - ]
Is Ruby easy to embed in a C program?
That was originally the point of Ruby
Yes -> https://mruby.org

It's also incredibly easy to extend the main Ruby implementation with C, C++, Odin, Zig, Rust, Fortran, etc... Literally a few lines.

  • ·
  • 27 minutes ago
  • ·
  • [ - ]
The reason it exists is to provide those features when programming computers.
> statically-typed

> Embed/extend in C

Is Lily intended to be (or could it be used as) a statically-typed alternative to Lua?

Personally I'm happy with dynamic typing for scripting - but I suspect many people would welcome a statically-typed option, and there don't seem to be many available.

I’m a sucker for little embeddable languages but I’m even more of a sucker for rpn. Wonderful little example shows how simple of a math scheme it is.
  • zombot
  • ·
  • 45 minutes ago
  • ·
  • [ - ]
And not only math. See Forth as a reference.
  • 7e
  • ·
  • 2 hours ago
  • ·
  • [ - ]
Has anyone yet designed a language with the explicit goal of being cheapest/easiest to use by an AI coding agent?
January 2026 might be the month of langs created to be used by AI. Usually the chief concern is saving on tokens, prompted by context window anxiety. (This completely disregards the fact that agents thrash the context window by doing wrong things, then attempting to fix them; or by reading unrelated stuff; or by calling unhelpful tools; etc)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46450217 Nerd: A language for LLMs, not humans (1 Jan 2026)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46571166 Show HN: GlyphLang – An AI-first programming language (11 Jan 2026)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46583581 Show HN: B-IR – An LLM-optimized programming language (12 Jan 2026)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46684958 Nanolang: A tiny experimental language designed to be targeted by coding LLMs (19 Jan 2026)

See also

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46582728 Which programming languages are most token-efficient? - where someone said "Someone has made a programming language called Sui, which is said to be designed for LLMs." https://github.com/TakatoHonda/sui-lang

And many other threads I didn't find right now

Not a language, but we are having very good success using https://brannn.github.io/simplex/ for autonomous one-shot workflows. It seems to be a very high-fidelity input for LLMs.